1 Reply Latest reply: Jul 25, 2012 9:18 AM by LeeHowes RSS

Implication of Apple patent on OpenCL

krrishnarraj Newbie
Currently Being Moderated

Apple has been granted patent on some features of opencl - http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2012/07/apple-wins-patents-relating-to-opencl-unreleased-dock.html

 

 

We have to just speculate how Apple is going to use this patent. But the picture looks scary when you read this article - http://www.decryptedtech.com/editorials/with-their-patent-on-opencl-will-apple-be-the-next-rambus

 

 

Some questions that ponder:

1. Why did Apple encourage for an open-standard, involve everyone in it, make them work on it and finally get patent on some of the features??

2. Can the terms Open* & patent coexist?

3. Now that the patent has been granted, people will be reluctant to choose OpenCL fearing legal obligations. Was that the intent of the OPEN standard??

4. How does the patent affect already existing or upcoming opencl product. Do we have to worry about Apple lawyers or bother with licensing?!

5. The original concept of blocking and launching threads on a gpu/device came up with Nvidia Cuda much before 2008 when Apple applied for patent

6. Would Apple be able/intends to curb any emergent new GPGPU platform?

  • Re: Implication of Apple patent on OpenCL
    LeeHowes Apprentice
    Currently Being Moderated

    Khronos has a legal framework and agreements for members. I imagine a lot of OpenGL is patented by one company or another.

    Lee Howes
    Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

    --------------------------------

    The information presented in this document is for informational purposes only and may contain technical inaccuracies, omissions and typographical errors. Links to third party sites are for convenience only, and no endorsement is implied.

More Like This